Announcing a service that guarantees Top 10 Google rankings in 30 days or less…
Do you have a website and need more traffic? Here's my risk-free, guaranteed seo services offer:
- I'll research keywords for your site...
- I'll help you pick a few of them...
- I'll create the pages for you to publish...
If one of those pages doesn't hit the Top 10 of Google within 30 days, you owe me nothing...
Not a penny...
If one of them does rank in the Top 10 within 30 days, you pay $97, and I’ll give you two more bonuses that are worth more than the price of the experiment:
- My brand new video course (recorded April 2026) that shows you exactly, step-by-step, what I did to find the keywords and build your pages.
- All the keywords I uncovered while I was hand selecting just the right keywords for your site…
You can literally use the videos, process, tools, and keywords to grab even more Top 10 rankings.
This is a risk-free trial for you. You don’t pay until I rank the page, and won’t pay if I can’t rank the page.
Too good to be true?
In the last 3 weeks, I’ve run this exact process 14 different times...
These 14 pages ranked in the Top 10 for 271 new keywords in 21 days.
This works…
But I want to be honest with you.
For $97… with everything I’ll be doing behind the scenes, I’m not making much here.
The only reason I’m doing this is because I want to take this service to a wider market…
But to do that, I need to test this in different industries so this has a chance to scale to a much wider audience.
For helping me at this early stage, you’re getting at least one page ranked in the Top 10 for a keyword that I find and you pre-approve.
I’ll also give you all the keywords I uncover in the process. You’re also getting full access to the video course for $97.
I’ll take “Before” screenshots to show your site didn’t rank for the test keywords before you publish the new pages.
Then I’ll get “After” screenshots of your Top 10 results to use as proof photos for this service. (I’ll blur the details, so nobody sees your website, industry, or keyword. And I’ll get your permission before I ever use them.)
You’ll work with me directly, via email, so I have limited this to just 9 other people right now. That way, I can give your test the attention it needs.
Are There Any Catches?
There are two…
-
We choose the keywords together: You tell me your site and where you want to send the traffic. I’ll dig deep and figure out who your ideal customer is, which keywords make sense, and then present a list of potential keyword candidates for you to choose from. If I can’t find keywords that I’m confident in, I’ll tell you that up front.
I’m not going after “golf” or “makeup” or “office supplies”… these are super generic, broad keywords.
I’m also not going after “lawn care Boise Idaho green grass call 1-800-Bob-Smith”.
I’m going to be sure you’re more than pleased with the keywords before we start, or we’ll do a virtual handshake and go our separate ways. (I can’t imagine this happening, but I want to avoid confusion.)
-
This works best for sites that already have some content and history. This isn’t for someone starting from scratch with a domain they just registered this morning, because 30 days may not be enough time in that scenario. I’ll be sure to look over your site and be upfront with you early on if I see any issues. I won’t waste your time. And once I commit to working with you, I’m on the hook to get the results.
How can I guarantee results in 30 days?
For years, every SEO has been told that the Google algorithm is getting smarter. But a court document tells the real story. What it reveals is the opposite of what Google has spent two decades telling us. So what actually determines if you get into the Top 10? That’s the question I wanted to answer. And the answer is the reason I can make this guarantee…
Trial Exhibit UPX0203:
U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Google LLC
This is the actual presentation shown to the entire Google Search team on December 8, 2016. A senior Google ranking engineer, Eric Lehman, presented the Ranking section.
Judging by how bad the slides look, Google never intended anyone outside that room to see this…
On page 5 of the deck, there’s a slide with this title:
“We do not understand documents. We fake it.”
“Today, our ability to understand documents directly is minimal. So we watch how people react to documents and memorize their responses.” - Google Search Engineer
“A billion times a day, people ask us to find documents relevant to a query. What’s crazy is that we don’t actually understand documents. Beyond some basic stuff, we hardly look at documents. We look at people. If a document gets a positive reaction, we figure it is good. If the reaction is negative, it is probably bad. Grossly simplified, this is the source of Google’s magic.” - Google Search Engineer “SO … if you search right now, you’ll benefit from the billions of past user reactions we’ve recorded. And your responses will benefit people who come after you. Search keeps working by induction.” - Google Search Engineer “When our fakery fails — maybe because a document is new, recently-changed, or rarely-shown — we look stupid.”
I’ve been at this for 21 years now...
Remember the warnings about Panda? Penguin? Hummingbird? RankBrain?
I don’t ever remember a Google spokesman officially saying, “When our fakery fails…we look stupid.”
Do you?
Now, I can already hear your objection.
“That document is from 2016. We have AI now. Are you living under a rock? Google uses Gemini to rank the SERPs…”
No. No rocks. I’m just a nerd with a calculator.
Yes, AI is real. Yes, the AI Overview at the top of the search results is real. Yes, Google is spending billions on AI right now.
But running every page in Google’s index through Gemini for ranking?
That’s very unlikely, and I’ll tell you why.
During cross-examination in the same DOJ trial, Pandu Nayak, Google’s Vice President of Search, was asked under oath how big the search index was.
He said roughly 400 billion pages.
My first instinct was to run the math on the energy costs and consumption.
But at that size, two things are gonna break before that math even matters.
First, the chip problem.
Trying to score 400 billion pages using Gemini would take a huge chunk of their processing power. They need those TPU (Tensor Processing Unit) chips to run Gemini chat, create AI Overviews, support Google Cloud accounts, and train new Gemini models. Dedicating such a large portion of their processing power for organic rankings would require a complete architectural overhaul.
Second, the clock problem.
Google aims to deliver search results in 300 milliseconds or less. Gemini takes longer than that just to start responding. For years, they’ve measured to two decimal places how much traffic they lose for every 100 milliseconds of delay.
Third, the power problem…
I’ll let Google take over the argument here.
In their February 2026 SEC filing, Google disclosed to investors that the energy supply is “constrained globally due to the significant increase in demand for and limited availability of energy to power AI compute.”
You don’t disclose to your investors that you have an energy constraint if you’ve solved it. And you don’t dare make that bottleneck worse running 400 billion pages through your latest LLM.
So yes, Gemini creates AI Overviews. And fake movie scenes, chat conversations, etc.
But Gemini is not scoring 400 billion pages to decide which ones to rank in the Top 10.
- It would hog their processing power…
- It would bog down their search…
- It would balloon their energy bill.
So if Gemini isn’t ranking the SERPs, what is?
That Google slide tells us: User signals…
But not the way some people think.
Google groups keywords by search intent. They don’t know what pages really mean or if they’re good. They have to guess which ones to test, then watch how users react to confirm if they should be in the Top 10.
That’s the “magic” mentioned in the meeting.
Not knowledge... induction.
And just like magic tricks, once you know how the illusion works, you can’t be fooled anymore…
Here’s a test from April 10th...
I built a page for a single keyword that SEMRush said had 880 monthly searches.
Nothing exciting on paper…
But I knew my ideal customers were behind the searches. (I like to start at the goal and work backwards to find ideal keywords.)
I wasn’t sure how many other keywords were in the same search intent group.
When I checked the stats about two weeks later, my test page already had over 8,119 search impressions from page 1 rankings.
The real search volume: 15,500 searches per month.
What happened?
The keyword group contains at least 182 different keywords. Google tested my new page for all those keywords to collect user signals, and since there were gaps, my test page was shown in the Top 10.
See how that works?
But Google can detect garbage…
Eric Lehman warned about their fakery failing on documents that are “new, recently-changed, or rarely-shown,” making them look stupid. So they work hard to try to keep fake pages out of the Top 10.
What about broad keywords like “golf” or “makeup”?
There’s so much search volume behind broad keywords that even page 2 or 3 can be used to gather user signals for new pages. Google doesn’t need to risk exposing the Top 10 to failure.
The number of commercial keywords that drive real traffic and sales is massive, even after you filter out the broad, generic terms.
I’d like to test ideal keywords for you…
What Do You Actually Get?
Here's what I'd like to do for you:
-
I'll find keywords for your site: Keywords that I know represent ideal buyers for your product or service, that also appear to have “user signal” gaps in the Top 10 results…
-
I'll build the pages: I’ll pay attention to your site, writing style, and what you already promote. I’ll present you with everything you need to copy, paste, and publish.
-
I'll monitor and track the results: The clock starts from the moment you publish the pages. I then use tools to monitor what is happening. I’ll also tell you where to look for results.
If one of my pages hits the Top 10 for the agreed upon keyword, you pay $97. I’ll then send you two things:
- My new video course showing the entire process, from start to finish, including the custom tool I used to create your pages…
- All the keywords I uncovered when I was preparing the tests for your site…
You can simply watch the videos and publish your next test page using my process, tools, and keywords. Or you can outsource the whole process...
The best part…
If I don’t hit the Top 10 for your keyword in 30 days, you don’t pay a penny. I don’t expect this to happen much, but it may happen a few times. If it does, I’ll study what went wrong so I can improve the process for the next test. And that’s a win too…
I hope you can see that I’ve got real skin in the game, and I’m very motivated to make this work for you…
Your Next Step Is Simple
If you think I can help you, fill out the form below...
I’ll look everything over and get back with you promptly. If I can’t help you, or I have more work than I can handle in this round, I’ll send a quick reply via email explaining the situation.
All communication will be done via email. No Zoom calls, no phones, no meetings. Just clear communication back and forth until you get a Top 10 result or I lose my end of the bargain and we part ways with a smile. ;)
The details you share with me before, during, or after your tests will be kept in strict confidence.
Please Note: This offer is currently full, but if you'd like to get on the waiting list, please fill out the form below. If a spot becomes available, I will contact you to begin the process. Thank you!
Your privacy is protected. You will only be contacted at this email about this specific offer. This is not a newsletter sign-up. I will reach out to you directly. Your information is never shared with third parties.
Last Updated: May 13, 2026 at 08:43 EST
Additional Sources
- Google: 8th Generation TPU Announcement (blog.google)
- Alphabet Inc. Form 10-K, Fiscal Year 2025 (sec.gov)
- Speed Matters — Google Search Latency Research (research.google)
- How Google Keeps Search Fast and Reliable (blog.google)
- The Google Gospel of Speed — Urs Hölzle (thinkwithgoogle.com)
- U.S. v. Google LLC — Trial Transcript, Day 24, Pandu Nayak Cross-Examination, Oct. 18, 2023 (thecapitolforum.com)
- Energy Use of AI Inference: Efficiency Pathways and Test-Time Compute — Oviedo et al., Microsoft Research (sciencedirect.com)
- Energy Use of AI Inference — arXiv preprint 2509.20241 (arxiv.org)